In regard to the gender-confused American Idol auditioner: I liked that judge Randy came right out and asked him if he’s a male, unafraid to acknowledge his disparate appearance. There’s this underlying belief in our society that it’s wrong to point out people’s differences. As a result, many people end up referring to others in confusing terms because they’re afraid the most obvious characteristics are too offensive to mention. It happens all the time but the best example I’ve experienced went something like this:
Friend: Listen to what happened to Barney Flarney* (not his real name)
Me: I don’t think I know a Barney Flarney
Friend: Sure you do. He’s tall-over six feet, wears flannel shirts and cut off gloves.
Me: Doesn’t ring a bell.
Friend: He always hangs out with Steve and Bobby.
Me: I don’t think I know him.
Friend: I know you know him. He came into some money and drives a new Mercedes.
Me: Maybe I’ve never met him.
Friend: You have. He’s uh…dark.
Me: Do you mean black?
Friend: Well, yeah, but he’s very dark…….. He has burns over 70% of his body.
Me: Oh the burn guy! Sure I know the burn guy! Everybody knows the burn guy!
(Before anybody accuses me of mocking him, I should note that’s essentially how he referred to himself).
The point being it’s ridiculous to describe random qualities a person possesses when there’s one in particular that clearly identifies the person. Don’t make me guess who the blue-eyed blonde you’re talking about is when all you have to say is she has a “pre-Trim Spa, Anna Nicole Smith-sized rack.” And don’t tell me about the sweet, quiet girl when you can tell me she has a “pre-Trim Spa, Anna Nicole Smith-sized body.”
Quite frequently I experience people’s circumvention of descriptions having to do with race, sexual orientation, body shape, handicaps, etc. even though that feature might separate the person a bit among others within our mutual frame of reference. Perhaps they think it’s PC to avoid partitioning people based on attributes that have been the basis for much discrimination. But to me, eschewing the obvious implies it’s something shameful. If it’s a biological trait (like skin color), there’s no reason for shame and if it’s a chosen trait (like sporting a porn star moustache), I say: out the fool.
I’ll show how important it is to stop this dilution of the English language. I’ll write the PC descriptions of some famous people along with the real world descriptions. Which would you prefer to see in the Final Jeopardy round?
RW: Fat black rich chick.
RW: Famous bald midget
RW: Tub of lard radio host who’s as deaf to the sound of music as he is to rational discourse.
RW: Black-turned-white guy who sleeps with little kids.
RW: Redneck ignoramus with a rap sheet who can’t string together five words without making at least three grammatical errors.
I’m not saying it’s necessary to use harsh terms like “tub of lard” to describe people, just don’t run down 20 traits before you get to, “He has no arms or legs.”

Kathleen wrote:
Good point. I think our nation can be a little oversensitive sometimes in our efforts not to insult people. It’s not that refering to G.W. Bush as a redneck is an insult, it’s simply the truth. What’s so wrong about the truth?
Chippy wrote:
I really hope that the days of ‘PC’ are numbered. I think that having to continually worry about ‘how’ we say things rather than ‘what’ we say is totally absurd and, arguably quite offensive as it implies that our command if the language is inadequate in some way.
Tell it the way it is!
Anonymous wrote:
Maybe GW Bush is a bad example of PC. He’s actually not a redneck, but he is a “good ole boy”. Learn the difference before you offend someone.
Is political correctness dying or is it evolving? Think about it. In order to not offend people, everyone is inventing new ways of describing themselves. The American Idol hermaphrodite could be called “gender challenged”, “sexually balanced”, “metrosexual”(like it has sex WITH A CITY!), or “Ryan Seacrest”.
Jenée wrote:
“He’s actually not a redneck, but he is a “good ole boy”. Learn the difference before you offend someone.”
I take great pride in knowing what the insults I throw around mean. Per Dictionary.com, one definition of redneck is, “A white person regarded as having a provincial, conservative, often bigoted attitude.”
I think that’s our Redneck of State in a nutshell.
Kerry-Ann wrote:
I agree, i have had that problem before, where i didn’t know how to address the perosn because i didn’t know if they were a boy or girl. Although i didn’t really understand your blog name (people are idiots).
Anonymous wrote:
“good ole boy” as defined by Dictionary.com: a white male Southerner with an unpretentious convivial manner and conservative or intolerant attitudes and a strong sense of fellowship with and loyalty to other members of his peer group.
Conservative, Southern, with cronies, can deliver a line like “you’re with us or you’re against us” in an unpretentious manner. Does this sound familiar?
If we can’t agree that GW is both a redneck and good ole boy, then can we not agree to call him GW The Cable Guy? This PC stuff is really difficult.
DerangedApe wrote:
I totally agree. Sometimes one wants to say something like, hey because you are so fat, you would really look better wearing this because it looks more natural on you. However, some people, like a co-worker I once had, are so sensitive about this trait of being fat that even when it is clearly obvious to everyone that she is fat, it is somehow an insult to even mention it or talk about fatness around the person. She thought the movie Shallow Hal was just about ridiculing fat people, for instance. She didn’t get the greater point they were making or have any appreciation for the ability to laugh at the ridiculous way we exaggerate the trait. It is true that I often see extremely fat people as disgusting looking, but I found her attractive. She had a pretty face, usually wore nice clothes, and had a pleasing personality that was mostly complementary to mine. It is true that she was more than just fatness. It is a denial of that fact to give special treatment to the fatness as though mentioning it would ruin her day. It probably would, though. That is why I think we need to quit stigmatizing it by making it taboo to even talk about. Of course, people talk about it and joke about it all the time, just not with someone they care about if that person could possibly be perceived as sensitive to it. I think people need to get over all their worries about themselves and start dealing with it. Retards are people with slow or difficult mental development. Jews are Jewish people. Blacks or Negros are African-Americans. Skinny people are very thin and narrow boned. I used to be somewhat afraid to describe someone as Asian for god sakes! Sure, the use of the word nigger should probably be left alone, but call a spade a spade, please.
abaddon1215 wrote:
“It is true that she was more than just fatness.”
Everyone, let the healing begin.
I would like to add one point: most people watch American Idol to see other people make asses of themselves, like President Bush does in press conferences. It’s also only a matter of time before Bin Laden takes an accidental kick-to-the-groin in one his terror tapes. Oh, I will laugh. And laugh.
The Benster! wrote:
I wasn’t refering to YOUR mother specifically… I just meant it in a general sense.
This is an unashamed advertisement for my blog: http://www.randomcoagulation.blogspot.com
Scott Addison wrote:
Stop blaming GW Bush. Just remember he is our president.
CLR wrote:
To describe someone’s physical or mental attributes can help identify that person or thing much more quickly and cut down on most of the confusion there might be, I myself like knowing whatever as quickly and clearly as possible and my crystal ball might be in the repair that week! If someone gets bent of shape because what was said to reference someone or something because it isn’t or wasn’t P.C. thats their problem, most people do use abit of tact most of the time, I hope the P.C. era is coming to an end as the correct way to say or be, it to me puts up many barriers that some folks will avoid dealing with then dealing with and that causes much more confusion I think!
Poetic Justice wrote:
Yah. Political correctness sucks like a Dyson.
justmyway wrote:
G.W. may or may not be a “redneck”, or whatever term you choose to use. But he is The President of The United States, and as such deserves more respect than you’ve shown. You don’t have to respect the man, but you do have to respect the office which he occupies. He has a difficult job and is constrained by what Congress will allow him to do. If you or anyone else thinks for one moment that you can do the job better, by all means try.
Linda Pynaker, Author and Spirit Medium wrote:
As a spirit medium, who is regularly called upon to facilitate communication with loved ones in spirit, I have to comment on a person’s traits, whether desirable or not. Not many people would be impressed by my ability to summon one of their deceased loved ones, if I insisted upon avoiding commenting on their identifying traits.
If her father was bald and paunchy. It is essential that I mention his lack of hair and round physique. In instances where the deceased mother was extremely overweight with brown hair. I must mention her hair color in addition to her size. When I tell someone they are going to meet a man, it would be remiss for me not to mention that he is African American, Hispanic, Jewish, or whatever is appropriate.
In one instance a man who had passed on sent an image of himself shoveling rocks, despite a missing limb. It turned out that he was a coal miner, with only one arm. His son became tearful when he realized that his father had actually arrived to communicate with him.
I have to admit, I feel uncomfortable, at times, but I would be unable to gain the trust of the people for whom I am providing readings, if I neglected mentioning these obvious characteristics.
rvds.design wrote:
You have a realy cool blog but these colors are horible. Not good for the eyes!!
david@gommstudios.com wrote:
This post has been removed by the author.
david wrote:
Then there was the time when I was in a conversation with a black guy in the army. We had been having a nice conversation about differences, until I asked him if blacks had dandruff.
He laughed loudly until he realized that I was serious and then he got mad. Now I thought it to be a pretty good question. It was the 70′s and I had never seen a black person in a dandruff shampoo commercial, so I wondered.
I didn’t get an answer that day, because he was too upset. So maybe some caution is in order.
theorangecast wrote:
point noted. but don’t think most people would like it if you called them by their most obvious faults.
Tibetan Underworld wrote:
I couldn’t agree with you more. Being tactful and being PC are two completely different things.
If someone is black, he should be described as black. If someone is fat, he should be described as fat (or at least rotund).
Here in Australia we got of PC fairly quickly. For a while our Crime Stoppers programme couldnt describe perpetrators by their race because it was seen as evoking some kind of generalisation or stereotype. We cottoned on pretty quickly that that was quite ludicrous, and that ignoring characteristics such as race is just another form of marginalisation.
Now don’t get me wrong, I believe in tact. There is a time and a place for obvious descriptions. However, lets not destroy our ability to communicate by forcing ourselves to qualify descriptions to spare the feelings of somebody that probably doesnt care.
Wow, that was more of a rant than I intended…
Tibetan Underworld wrote:
As for the guy who said “Stop blaming George Bush. Just remember he is our President”, i think Jenee blog title proves correct…
Isn’t your country based on a system of checks and balances? What is all this crap about questioning government officials as being unpatriotic. If you actually read your constitution I think you will find it is the most patriotic thing you can do in the United States.
Just a thought…
kikkokatty2433 wrote:
I have some confusion with my sexual orientation these days.
anonymous wrote:
I wouldn’t go so far as to say referring to our Prez as an idiot is patriotic, but that is our right.
MP V wrote:
what I want to know is, why can a fat person describe someone else as fat but a thinner person can’t? I have found myself describing someone as fat or big to a larger person…upon the realization of my faux paus…I simply said “I mean, they were bigger than you!” They are still speaking to me, so it must be okay. Geez…the first three questions I ask people when describing someone is black/white, tall/short, fat/thin. I guess I didn’t get the PC memo.
joan brack wrote:
Were not Italians the first Latin Lovers?
What happened? The term Latin Lover was invented for the Italian movie stars like Rudy Valentino. Do Italians not think of themselves as Latin anymore? Or is that title gone over to the Latinos?